Secondary Endpoint - ASCENT Results | TRODELVY® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) HCP Site

Skip to main content

For the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have received two or more prior systemic therapies, at least one of them for metastatic disease

Help give your patients more time: ~5 more months of OS with TRODELVY vs chemotherapy1

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS (full population)

In the primary analysis (brain-met–negative) population, TRODELVY demonstrated statistically significant improvement in mOS vs single-agent chemotherapy2

  • mOS was 12.1 months with TRODELVY (95% CI: 10.7–14.0) (n=235) vs 6.7 months with single-agent chemotherapy (95% CI: 5.8–7.7) (n=233); HR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.38–0.59); P<0.001

Exploratory findings in previously treated, stable brain-met–positive patients1

  • mOS was 6.8 months with TRODELVY (95% CI: 4.7–14.1) (n=32) vs 7.4 months with single-agent chemotherapy (95% CI: 4.7–11.1) (n=29); HR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.47–1.63)

In a follow-up analysis of the brain-met–negative population (data cutoff: February 25, 2021)3,*:

  • 2-year OS rate was 22.4% with TRODELVY (95% CI: 16.8–28.5) vs 5.2% with single-agent chemotherapy (95% CI: 2.5–9.4)
  • 2-year OS rate was 22.4% with TRODELVY (95% CI: 16.8–28.5) vs 5.2% with single-agent chemotherapy (95% CI: 2.5–9.4)

*Limitation: This analysis was not powered for significance as part of the pivotal study and should be considered descriptive only. Therefore, the results require cautious interpretation and could represent chance findings.


In a post hoc subgroup analysis

mOS of TRODELVY vs 4 single-agent chemotherapies in the comparator arm4,†

Kaplan-Meier estimates of mOS by BICR based on RECIST 1.1 criteria (brain-metnegative population)

  • 88% of patients in the study were brain-met–negative2
  • Within the single-agent chemotherapy arm, eribulin was the most commonly chosen chemotherapy (n=126), followed by vinorelbine (n=47), capecitabine (n=31), and gemcitabine (n=29)4

Limitation: These results are from a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Phase 3 ASCENT study. The single-agent chemotherapy arms were not powered for statistical analysis or designed to compare against individual agents and should be considered descriptive only. Therefore, the results require cautious interpretation and could represent chance findings.5

Select safety findings4:
  • Key Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with TRODELVY vs eribulin included neutropenia (51% vs 31%), leukopenia (10% vs 5%), diarrhea (10% vs 0%), anemia (8% vs 2%), febrile neutropenia (6% vs 2%), fatigue (3% vs 5%), nausea (3% vs 1%), and vomiting (1% vs 1%)
  • Key Grade ≥3 TRAEs with TRODELVY vs vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine combined included neutropenia (51% vs 36%), leukopenia (10% vs 6%), diarrhea (10% vs 1%), anemia (8% vs 8%), febrile neutropenia (6% vs 2%), fatigue (3% vs 6%), nausea (3% vs 0%), and vomiting (1% vs 0%)
  • Discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events for TRODELVY, eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine were 5%, 2%, 10%, 7%, and 9%, respectively
  • 1 treatment-related death was reported for the single-agent chemotherapy arm (eribulin; neutropenic sepsis) and none with TRODELVY

Explore post hoc results across IHC scores in ASCENT5,‡

IHC and ISH results for the full population of ASCENT were analyzed retrospectively to determine the efficacy of TRODELVY by HER2-negative status5

  • Patients with known HER2-positive disease were ineligible for ASCENT5
  • Demographics and baseline characteristics between the following populations were comparable: the ASCENT full population (all patients with and without brain metastases) and HER2-evaluable full population, including HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low (defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ with negative ISH)1,5

ASCENT enrolled 529 adults across IHC status5

79% of patients in the ASCENT ITT population (N=529) were HER2-evaluable by IHC, and 21% were unevaluable by IHC5

  • ASCENT included 267 patients treated with TRODELVY and 262 patients treated with single-agent chemotherapy
  • 113 patients were missing specific HER2 IHC results (21% for TRODELVY, n=55, and 22% for single-agent chemotherapy, n=58)

Patients who were HER2-evaluable were divided into 2 groups by IHC status: HER2-low (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-) and HER2 IHC 05,#

  • HER2-low (24% for TRODELVY, n=63, and 23% for single-agent chemotherapy, n=60)
  • IHC 0 (56% for TRODELVY, n=149, and 55% for single-agent chemotherapy, n=144)

Limitations: These results are from a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Phase 3 ASCENT study, were not powered for statistical analysis, and should be considered descriptive only. The lack of central assessment for HER2 expression and the 21% of patients in the ASCENT full population with missing specific HER2 IHC results are known limitations of this study. Therefore, these results require cautious interpretation and could represent chance findings.5

§21% (n=113) of the patients in ASCENT were IHC unevaluable.5

||Of the 23% HER2-low (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-) patients in ASCENT, 12% and 11% of the ITT population were treated with TRODELVY and chemotherapy, respectively.5

Of the 55% HER2- IHC 0 patients in ASCENT, 28% and 27% of the ITT population were treated with TRODELVY and chemotherapy, respectively.5

#HER2-negative status was based on local assessment of the most recent biopsy/pathology report.5

Results from the post hoc subgroup analysis of HER2-negative status by IHC score5,**

**Limitation: These results are from a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Phase 3 ASCENT study, were not powered for statistical analysis, and should be considered descriptive only. The lack of central assessment for HER2 expression and the 21% of patients in the ASCENT full population with missing specific HER2 IHC results are known limitations of this study. Therefore, these results require cautious interpretation and could represent chance findings.5,‡‡

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS

H E R 2 - l o w I H C 0
T R O D E L V Y S in g l e - a g e n t c h e m o t h e r a p y Numbe r o f patie n ts a t risk: 6 0 4 9 43 3 8 2 6 1 4 1 0 7 3 3 1 6 3 6 1 5 7 5 4 4 5 3 8 3 2 2 6 1 7 1 0 5 2 0 0 0

Consistent OS results across HER2- IHC status compared to the full population5

††HER2-low defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-.5

‡‡HER2-negative status was based on local assessment of the most recent biopsy/pathology report.5

National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recommended

Option in 2L mTNBC

2L=second line; BICR=blinded independent central review; brain-met=brain metastases; CI=confidence interval; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hazard ratio; IHC=immunohistochemistry; ISH=in situ hybridization; ITT=intent-to-treat; mOS=median OS; mTNBC=metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; OS=overall survival.

References: 1. TRODELVY. Prescribing Information. Gilead Sciences, Inc.; November 2024. 2. Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529-1541. 3. Bardia A, Tolaney SM, Loirat D, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: final data from the phase 3 ASCENT study. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2022; Chicago, IL. Poster 1071. 4. O’Shaughnessy J, Punie K, Oliveira M, et al. Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan vs treatment of physician’s choice cohort by agent in the phase 3 ASCENT study of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 4-8, 2021. Poster 1077. https://meetings.asco.org/meetings/2021-asco-annual-meeting/273/program-guide/scheduled-sessions 5. Hurvitz SA, Bardia A, Punie K, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan efficacy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer by HER2 immunohistochemistry status: findings from the Phase 3 ASCENT study. Poster presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Breast Cancer Congress; May 3-5, 2022; Geneva, Switzerland. Poster 168P. 6. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Breast Cancer V.4.2024. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2024. All rights reserved. Accessed July 3, 2024. To view the most recent and complete version of the guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.

INDICATION

TRODELVY® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) is a Trop-2-directed antibody and topoisomerase inhibitor conjugate indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have received two or more prior systemic therapies, at least one of them for metastatic disease.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

BOXED WARNING: NEUTROPENIA AND DIARRHEA
  • Severe or life-threatening neutropenia may occur. Withhold TRODELVY for absolute neutrophil count below 1500/mm3 or neutropenic fever. Monitor blood cell counts periodically during treatment. Consider G-CSF for secondary prophylaxis. Initiate anti-infective treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia without delay.
  • Severe diarrhea may occur. Monitor patients with diarrhea and give fluid and electrolytes as needed. At the onset of diarrhea, evaluate for infectious causes and, if negative, promptly initiate loperamide. If severe diarrhea occurs, withhold TRODELVY until resolved to ≤Grade 1 and reduce subsequent doses.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
  • Severe hypersensitivity reaction to TRODELVY.
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Neutropenia: Severe, life-threatening, or fatal neutropenia can occur and may require dose modification. Neutropenia occurred in 64% of patients treated with TRODELVY. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 49% of patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 6%. Neutropenic colitis occurred in 1.4%. Withhold TRODELVY for absolute neutrophil count below 1500/mm3 on Day 1 of any cycle or neutrophil count below 1000/mm3 on Day 8 of any cycle. Withhold TRODELVY for neutropenic fever. Administer G-CSF as clinically indicated or indicated in Table 1 of USPI.

Diarrhea: Diarrhea occurred in 64% of all patients treated with TRODELVY. Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 11% of patients. One patient had intestinal perforation following diarrhea. Diarrhea that led to dehydration and subsequent acute kidney injury occurred in 0.7% of all patients. Withhold TRODELVY for Grade 3-4 diarrhea and resume when resolved to ≤Grade 1. At onset, evaluate for infectious causes and if negative, promptly initiate loperamide, 4 mg initially followed by 2 mg with every episode of diarrhea for a maximum of 16 mg daily. Discontinue loperamide 12 hours after diarrhea resolves. Additional supportive measures (e.g., fluid and electrolyte substitution) may also be employed as clinically indicated. Patients who exhibit an excessive cholinergic response to treatment can receive appropriate premedication (e.g., atropine) for subsequent treatments.

Hypersensitivity and Infusion-Related Reactions: Serious hypersensitivity reactions including life-threatening anaphylactic reactions have occurred with TRODELVY. Severe signs and symptoms included cardiac arrest, hypotension, wheezing, angioedema, swelling, pneumonitis, and skin reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions within 24 hours of dosing occurred in 35% of patients. Grade 3-4 hypersensitivity occurred in 2% of patients. The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions leading to permanent discontinuation of TRODELVY was 0.2%. The incidence of anaphylactic reactions was 0.2%. Pre-infusion medication is recommended. Have medications and emergency equipment to treat such reactions available for immediate use. Observe patients closely for hypersensitivity and infusion-related reactions during each infusion and for at least 30 minutes after completion of each infusion. Permanently discontinue TRODELVY for Grade 4 infusion-related reactions.

Nausea and Vomiting: Nausea occurred in 64% of all patients treated with TRODELVY and Grade 3-4 nausea occurred in 3% of these patients. Vomiting occurred in 35% of patients and Grade 3-4 vomiting occurred in 2% of these patients. Premedicate with a two or three drug combination regimen (e.g., dexamethasone with either a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist or an NK1 receptor antagonist as well as other drugs as indicated) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Withhold TRODELVY doses for Grade 3 nausea or Grade 3-4 vomiting and resume with additional supportive measures when resolved to Grade ≤1. Additional antiemetics and other supportive measures may also be employed as clinically indicated. All patients should be given take-home medications with clear instructions for prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting.

Increased Risk of Adverse Reactions in Patients with Reduced UGT1A1 Activity: Patients homozygous for the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1)*28 allele are at increased risk for neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anemia and may be at increased risk for other adverse reactions with TRODELVY. The incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia was 58% in patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28, 49% in patients heterozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele, and 43% in patients homozygous for the wild-type allele. The incidence of Grade 3-4 anemia was 21% in patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele, 10% in patients heterozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele, and 9% in patients homozygous for the wild-type allele. Closely monitor patients with known reduced UGT1A1 activity for adverse reactions. Withhold or permanently discontinue TRODELVY based on clinical assessment of the onset, duration and severity of the observed adverse reactions in patients with evidence of acute early-onset or unusually severe adverse reactions, which may indicate reduced UGT1A1 function.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Based on its mechanism of action, TRODELVY can cause teratogenicity and/or embryo-fetal lethality when administered to a pregnant woman. TRODELVY contains a genotoxic component, SN-38, and targets rapidly dividing cells. Advise pregnant women and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with TRODELVY and for 6 months after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with TRODELVY and for 3 months after the last dose.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

In the pooled safety population, the most common (≥25%) adverse reactions including laboratory abnormalities were decreased leukocyte count (84%), decreased neutrophil count (75%), decreased hemoglobin (69%), diarrhea (64%), nausea (64%), decreased lymphocyte count (63%), fatigue (51%), alopecia (45%), constipation (37%), increased glucose (37%), decreased albumin (35%), vomiting (35%), decreased appetite (30%), decreased creatinine clearance (28%), increased alkaline phosphatase (28%), decreased magnesium (27%), decreased potassium (26%), and decreased sodium (26%).

In the ASCENT study, the most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥25%) were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, alopecia, constipation, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. The most frequent serious adverse reactions (SAR) (>1%) were neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (4%), and pneumonia (3%). SAR were reported in 27% of patients, and 5% discontinued therapy due to adverse reactions. The most common Grade 3-4 lab abnormalities (incidence ≥25%) in the ASCENT study were reduced neutrophils, leukocytes, and lymphocytes.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

UGT1A1 Inhibitors: Concomitant administration of TRODELVY with inhibitors of UGT1A1 may increase the incidence of adverse reactions due to potential increase in systemic exposure to SN-38. Avoid administering UGT1A1 inhibitors with TRODELVY.

UGT1A1 Inducers: Exposure to SN-38 may be reduced in patients concomitantly receiving UGT1A1 enzyme inducers. Avoid administering UGT1A1 inducers with TRODELVY.

Please see full Prescribing Information, including BOXED WARNING.